Technology

Quantum computing with diamond

XeedQ builds quantum processors using individual electron and nuclear spins in diamond.

How NV computing works

A nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center is a defect in diamond: a nitrogen atom next to a missing carbon atom. Its electron spin and nearby nuclear spins have quantum states that we use as qubits.

Laser light initializes the electron spin, and its fluorescence provides a way to read out the result of a computation. Microwave and radio-frequency pulses control the spins to perform quantum operations.

The nitrogen nucleus and nearby carbon nuclei couple to the electron through hyperfine interactions. Together, these spins form a quantum register. The nuclear spins retain quantum information for much longer than the electron spin.

Available today

XQ1 — 4 qubits One NV center

XQ1 star topology: one central electron spin connected to one nitrogen and two illustrative carbon nuclear spins through hyperfine interactions.

XQ1 is our first-generation device. One NV electron spin couples to its nitrogen nuclear spin and two or more carbon nuclear spins, forming a star-shaped register.

Explore XQ1

In production

XQ2 — 8 qubits Two NV centers

XQ2 tree topology: two electron spins joined by a dipolar interaction, each connected to nitrogen and carbon nuclear spins through hyperfine interactions.

XQ2 is our second-generation quantum computer. It contains two coupled NV centers, each of them coupled to nuclear spins. This forms a tree topology.

Double electron–electron resonance (DEER) pulse sequences control this dipole–dipole electron interaction. The electron spins act as a bus between the longer-lived nuclear qubits.

  • Electron spin
  • Nuclear spin · N: nitrogen, C: carbon
  • Hyperfine interaction
  • Electron–electron dipolar interaction

Scaling beyond two registers

Our goal is a larger network of entangled NV registers. When entangled, neighboring electron spins will connect the nuclear spin qubits, offering a Hilbert space that grows exponentially with the number of qubits.

Six NV registers shown as part of a larger proposed two-dimensional network, with nuclear spins attached to each electron. Dashed dipolar links continue toward all four edges and end in dots to indicate further registers.
Section of a larger entangled two-dimensional NV-register network.

Scaling challenges

Extending this architecture requires precise placement of NV centers and selective control and readout of all qubits.

Fabricating coupled registers

One challenge is to place NV centers approximately 10 nm apart. Their separation determines the strength of the electron–electron dipolar interaction.

Ion-beam implantation offers a route to introducing nitrogen into selected regions of diamond. Subsequent heat treatment allows vacancies to move and form NV centers. Implantation position alone does not guarantee the final position of a usable center: ion scattering, defect formation, and implantation damage all affect the result.

Scaling therefore requires more than a precise pattern. We need reproducible fabrication that preserves spin coherence and stable optical behavior across many registers.

Related fabrication research

SparQ develops ion-beam and diamond-fabrication methods to improve color-center positioning and spin-qubit properties.

StarQ addresses a complementary part of fabrication: diamond surface treatment at atomic resolution.

Resolving and addressing individual spins

Strong coupling requirements force NVs close together. Addressing them individually then requires selectivity in both space and frequency.

Spatial resolution: below the diffraction limit

At approximately 10 nm separation, neighboring NV centers lie far below the diffraction-limited resolution of confocal microscopy. A focused laser spot illuminates several centers rather than resolving one. Distinguishing their optical signals and selectively initializing or reading out a register presents an additional challenge beyond placing them nanometers apart.

Spectral resolution: separating spin resonances

Microwave and radio-frequency pulses address transitions between spin states. For frequency-selective control, the spins we want to address independently need sufficiently different resonance frequencies. If resonances overlap, a pulse intended for one qubit can also drive others, causing crosstalk.

The frequency separation must be sufficient relative to the resonance linewidths and the pulse bandwidth. Shorter pulses generally cover a broader frequency range, so faster control can make selectivity more demanding. Scaling requires usable, stable spectral separation as well as close physical spacing.

We are implementing localized magnetic and strain-based methods that could enable site-resolved and frequency-resolved measurements.